Custom Search

Result of the screening test for lecturers in government inter colleges of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (PSC) has announced the results of the “screening test for lecturers in government inter colleges  2009” on 27th September 2010.
Follow this link to see your result-
Result of the screening test for lecturers in government inter colleges  2009 
And if this link does not work for you then you can check the Hindi daily like Amar Ujala, Dainik jagaran, or Hindustan of that date.

The exam was held on 26 Th of May 2010, with this fact in mind the process of declaration of the results comes at good time. Unnecessary delay perhaps was avoided.  So that’s a good job done.
But now coming on to the point, just ask or you might have enquired yourself that your near and dear ones have not been selected in spite of regular preparations, long wait and the drudgery of getting a sarkari job.
Well some might have deserved ones. Little bit of luck is sometime needed to make it through.
What comes to my mind is the Ghost of negative marking had its effect on the final merit list.
The provision of negative marking had played its role in including some in the list and excluding some (may be the deserving ones) from the list.
But in fact you can’t blame it on PSC right??
It was open for all. And hope the whole process had been accomplished without nepotism or favoritism.
But there is some thing I would like to point out before you all especially who have gone through the list and who had been aware of the total number of seats available in each category.

Have you seen the passing number of candidates in Geography?

Well it’s showing 66 candidates (general) have been selected but wait…. How many seats were there?
Someone told me they were 46(general).
Ok then what are the criterias for selection in the interview?  I mean how many candidates are there for each seat.
Generally it is 4, 5 or six candidates for a single seat. That’s a simple math.
There is same question for some other categories too barring others where the logic of that simple formulae is maintained.
So why not it was maintained for each and every category. There are questions
-What was the general rule followed to prepare the list?
Isn’t the list prepared in hurry is lacking in something?
 As we have seen with that the answer sheet to the questions asked in the exams, which was published on their site was full of mistakes.

Latest Comments

Powered by Disqus

Information archive